Route Switching in Imitation: Should I Stay or Should I Go? Raffaella Rumiati ([email protected])
نویسندگان
چکیده
The dual-route models of action imitation predict that, normally, known actions are imitated by using a semantic route i.e. by activating a representation of the action from memory whereas unknown, new actions are reproduced by using a direct route i.e. by performing a visuo-motor transformation of the input into an output. Here we aimed at establishing the nature of the dominant process used by healthy adult individuals in imitation. Participants performed an imitation task with both predictable switches and pseudorandom, unpredictable switches The predictable switches are less cognitively demanding, and allow the voluntary selection of the most suitable process for performing the task; whereas the unpredictable switches are more demanding and lead to a more intense use of strategies. We observed significant switch costs only in the predictable switch condition, when subjects had to rely on working memory to keep track of the underlying sequence, but not in the pseudorandom sequences, where participants could select the direct route to decrease the cognitive effort. These findings suggest that the semantic route is the dominant, more automatic and less-demanding process for action imitation. The strategic selection of route in action imitation and in monitoring behaviour seems to be an adaptive acquisition.
منابع مشابه
Preserved Imitation of Known Gestures in Children with High-Functioning Autism
It has been suggested that children with autism are particularly deficient at imitating novel gestures or gestures without goals. In the present study, we asked high-functioning autistic children and age-matched typically developing children to imitate several types of gestures that could be either already known or novel to them. Known gestures either conveyed a communicative meaning (i.e., int...
متن کاملOp-scan140163 1054..1060
Claudia Civai, Carlo Miniussi, and Raffaella I. Rumiati Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Neuroscience Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy, Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia Italy, and, and Neuroscience Area, SISSA, Tries...
متن کاملNeuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation.
Cognitive neuroscientists have contributed to the understanding of imitation according to their expertise. Neuropsychologists first established over a century ago that lesions to the left hemisphere of right-handed individuals lead to a dramatic reduction of their ability to imitate gestures. In contrast, after frontal lobe damage, patients may experience severe difficulties in inhibiting their...
متن کاملTo imitate or not to imitate? How the brain can do it, that is the question!
In this paper the authors discuss the most prominent views addressing the issue of how we imitate actions. It is argued that the existing theories lay along a continuum, with the direct mapping approach at one end (Butterworth, 1990; Gray, Neisser, Shapiro, & Kouns, 1991) the Active Intermodal Matching approach (Melzoff & Moore, 1997) in the middle, and the goal-directed theory (Bekkering, Wohl...
متن کاملNeuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation.
Previous studies have suggested that imitators can reproduce known gestures shown by a model using a semantic, indirect route, and novel gestures using a sublexical, direct route. In the present study we aimed at testing the validity of such a dual-route model of action imitation. Patients with either left-brain damage (LBD) or right-brain damage (RBD) were tested on an action imitation task. A...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009